Constitutional law in the internet age
Justin: If the privilege of habeas corpus is to be denied to the detainees now before us, Congress must act in accordance with the requirements of the Suspension Clause. Cf. Hamdi, 542 U. S., at 564 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (“[I]ndefinite imprisonment on reasonable suspicion is not an available option of treatment for those accused of aiding the enemy, absent a suspension of the writ”).
Ross: haha pwn
Sent at 11:11 AM on Wednesday
I realized after the sausage party that when we were discussing legal crap, Justin casually referenced Marbury v. Madison and I, for some reason, thought he had mentioned Lochner v. New York. That explains my no doubt inscrutable comment about bakery hours. I was clearly craving dessert and had baked goods on the brain. This comment makes that party sound much nerdier than it actually was. That takes some doing.
— Tim | @
I should hope you were talking about Lochner. Honestly.
— Justin | @